Export limit exceeded: 92249 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 16287 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 44662 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (44662 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-46828 | 3 Debian, Libtirpc Project, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Libtirpc, Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| In libtirpc before 1.3.3rc1, remote attackers could exhaust the file descriptors of a process that uses libtirpc because idle TCP connections are mishandled. This can, in turn, lead to an svc_run infinite loop without accepting new connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107426 | 2026-10-14 | 7.3 High | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in VideoWhisper.com Paid Videochat Turnkey Site ppv-live-webcams allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Paid Videochat Turnkey Site: from n/a through 7.5.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76264 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.10, and 9.4.15, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could create or edit scripted lookup definitions through raw configuration endpoints. The vulnerability is possible because raw transforms configuration write paths do not apply external lookup capability checks before saving scripted lookup settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62040 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in DEV Institute Restrict User Access – Membership Plugin with Force restrict-user-access allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Restrict User Access – Membership Plugin with Force: from n/a through 2.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102596 | 1 Nangohq | 1 Nango | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Nango is an open-source platform for connecting agents and products to third-party APIs. Prior to 0.70.9, on accounts with RBAC enabled through a plan with has_rbac=true, two private flow-read routes, GET /api/v1/integrations/:providerConfigKey/flows and GET /api/v1/flow/:flowName, apply webAuth but omit can({ action: 'read', resource: 'flow', scopedBy: envScope }). A same-team user with the development_full_access role can therefore request env=prod and read production integration flow metadata or named flow configuration despite being denied by guarded production routes. Both controllers use res.locals.environment from the authenticated account, so the issue bypasses the production role boundary but does not cross tenant boundaries. This issue is fixed in version 0.70.9 and managed-1.5.11-0.70.8-aae30d044d7e229807d51a3957c212f3fb689e1a | ||||
| CVE-2021-33294 | 1 Elfutils Project | 1 Elfutils | 2026-10-14 | 5.5 Medium |
| In elfutils 0.183, an infinite loop was found in the function handle_symtab in readelf.c .Which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via crafted file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22926 | 5 Haxx, Netapp, Oracle and 2 more | 26 Curl, Active Iq Unified Manager, Clustered Data Ontap and 23 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the command line tool).When libcurl is built to use the macOS native TLS library Secure Transport, an application can ask for the client certificate by name or with a file name - using the same option. If the name exists as a file, it will be used instead of by name.If the appliction runs with a current working directory that is writable by other users (like `/tmp`), a malicious user can create a file name with the same name as the app wants to use by name, and thereby trick the application to use the file based cert instead of the one referred to by name making libcurl send the wrong client certificate in the TLS connection handshake. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76270 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, a user that holds a role with the list_spl2_modules capability could use SQL injection in SPL2 module filtering to access all relevant data available through the affected Representational State Transfer (REST) API, including private SPL2 module definitions belonging to other users. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Enterprise and Splunk Cloud Platform do not parameterize user-supplied values before using them in database queries for SPL2 module filtering. For more information see Manage SPL2 modules (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/spl2-search-manual/multiple-searches-in-an-spl2-module/manage-spl2-modules) and Module permissions (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/spl2-search-manual/modules-statements-and-views/module-permissions) in the Splunk documentation. Splunk Enterprise versions 10.2.x, 10.0.x, and 9.4.x are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76272 | 1 Splunk | 3 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.7, 10.0.10, and 9.4.15, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could cause Splunk Secure Gateway to sign attacker-controlled payloads. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not verify that the user is authorized to request a signature. Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.11, 3.9.25, and 3.8.72 are also affected. For more information see Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107433 | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in miniOrange WP OAuth Server miniorange-oauth-20-server allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP OAuth Server: from n/a through 6.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92387 | 2026-10-14 | 3.7 Low | ||
| A flaw was found in curl. When communicating with a malicious server using protocols such as FTP, IMAP, POP3, or SMTP, the server can trigger an infinite loop by continuously transmitting data while omitting the final control response line. This behavior bypasses configured transfer timeouts, indefinitely blocking concurrent transfers and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-95639 | 2026-10-14 | 8.6 High | ||
| Photoshop Desktop is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75994 | 2026-10-14 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerable component is restricted to an administrative network zone by default. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23707 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortianalyzercloud and 3 more | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.11, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4 may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23706 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager | 2026-10-14 | 5.9 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.11, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiManager 7.2 all versions may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23705 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiManager 7.2 all versions may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106176 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2026-10-14 | 3.4 Low |
| A missing authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via Specially crafted HTTP requests | ||||
| CVE-2025-57739 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-10-14 | 7.7 High |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ("SQL Injection") vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiMail 7.2.0 through 7.2.8 allows an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22922 | 7 Fedoraproject, Haxx, Netapp and 4 more | 25 Fedora, Curl, Cloud Backup and 22 more | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| When curl is instructed to download content using the metalink feature, thecontents is verified against a hash provided in the metalink XML file.The metalink XML file points out to the client how to get the same contentfrom a set of different URLs, potentially hosted by different servers and theclient can then download the file from one or several of them. In a serial orparallel manner.If one of the servers hosting the contents has been breached and the contentsof the specific file on that server is replaced with a modified payload, curlshould detect this when the hash of the file mismatches after a completeddownload. It should remove the contents and instead try getting the contentsfrom another URL. This is not done, and instead such a hash mismatch is onlymentioned in text and the potentially malicious content is kept in the file ondisk. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22897 | 5 Haxx, Netapp, Oracle and 2 more | 30 Curl, Cloud Backup, H300e and 27 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| curl 7.61.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from exposure of data element to wrong session due to a mistake in the code for CURLOPT_SSL_CIPHER_LIST when libcurl is built to use the Schannel TLS library. The selected cipher set was stored in a single "static" variable in the library, which has the surprising side-effect that if an application sets up multiple concurrent transfers, the last one that sets the ciphers will accidentally control the set used by all transfers. In a worst-case scenario, this weakens transport security significantly. | ||||