Export limit exceeded: 408730 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (408730 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0317 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Pan-os | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| A denial of service vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables an authenticated user with a read-only administrator role to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending a specially crafted API request. The security risk posed by this issue is significantly minimized by restricting access to the management web interface to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/tips-amp-tricks-how-to-secure-the-management-access-of-your-palo/ba-p/464431 . Cloud NGFW, Panorama, and Prisma® Access are not affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0316 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Pan-os | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables a malicious authenticated administrator to store or execute a JavaScript payload using the web interface. The security risk posed by this issue is minimized when the management interface is restricted to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/tips-amp-tricks-how-to-secure-the-management-access-of-your-palo/ba-p/464431 . This issue is applicable to PAN-OS® software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not affected by these vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0315 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Globalprotect App | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| A local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app enables a local user to escalate their privileges to root on macOS. This enables a non-administrative user to execute arbitrary commands with administrative privileges. The GlobalProtect app on Linux, Windows, iOS, Android and Chrome OS is not affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0314 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Globalprotect App | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| A type confusion vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app on Windows enables a local user with low privileges to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The GlobalProtect™ app on Linux, macOS, iOS, Android, and Chrome OS is not affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0312 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Checkov By Prisma Cloud | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| Path traversal vulnerabilities in Palo Alto Networks Checkov by Prisma® Cloud enable an unauthenticated local user to write files to arbitrary locations on the scanning filesystem. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70520 | 1 Fanvil | 1 X7a | 2026-10-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The websocket handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce proper authentication restrictions against sessionless users. The lack of restrictions grants anyone the ability to view any device resources such as operational logs or perform diagnostic requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68404 | 2026-10-15 | N/A | ||
| A time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition vulnerability has been reported to affect QuRouter. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers to compromise the security of the system. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuRouter 2.6.4.001 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-68403 | 2026-10-15 | N/A | ||
| An external control of system or configuration setting vulnerability has been reported to affect QuRouter. If a local attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify data on the system. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuRouter 2.7.2.113 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-66275 | 2026-10-15 | N/A | ||
| A path traversal vulnerability has been reported to affect Video Station. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to read the contents of unexpected files or system data. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Video Station 5.8.5 and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-61624 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 1 more | 2026-10-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7.0, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 may allow an authenticated attacker with admin profile and at least read-write permissions to write or delete arbitrary files via specific CLI commands. | ||||
| CVE-2017-20283 | 1 Nxp | 1 Mqx | 2026-10-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| NXP MQX Classic before 5.0 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the RTCS UDP recvfrom() implementation. Improper enforcement of the application-supplied receive buffer length may allow a crafted UDP packet to overflow the destination buffer, resulting in memory corruption, or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91882 | 2026-10-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| Dell Terraform Provider for OME, versions 1.0.0 through 1.2.3, contains an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Externally-Accessible File or Directory vulnerability in the API client error handling component. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110734 | 1 Godotengine | 1 Godot Engine | 2026-10-15 | 2.5 Low |
| Godot Engine through 4.7.2 has a heap out-of-bounds write in the Radiance HDR (.hdr) image decoder (modules/hdr/image_loader_hdr.cpp). The run-length decoding loop expands RLE instructions read from the file into a buffer sized from the image dimensions, without validating that an instruction's repeat/copy count fits the remaining capacity of the row buffer. A crafted .hdr file therefore writes attacker-supplied bytes past the end of the heap allocation, with the overflow length and content controlled by the file. The defect is reached automatically when the product imports a crafted .hdr (e.g., when opening a project containing one), and at runtime in exported projects that load untrusted .hdr images. NOTE: the Supplier's position is that the research has identified "no security issues" because the required attacker access is outside of the current Godot Engine threat model. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96577 | 2 Oc-mirror, Redhat | 3 Oc-mirror, Assisted Installer, Openshift | 2026-10-15 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in oc-mirror. During mirroring operations, the embedded local cache registry binds to all network interfaces without authentication or encryption instead of restricting access to the local system. An unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network can connect to the exposed service to push tampered container images, delete cached images, or access mirrored content. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83589 | 2 Oauth2 Proxy Project, Redhat | 2 Oauth2 Proxy, Openshift | 2026-10-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in oauth-proxy. The application fails to properly validate the destination redirect parameter (`rd`) during post-login redirection. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by enticing a user to follow a specially crafted link, resulting in the user being redirected to an arbitrary external website after authenticating. This open redirect can be leveraged to conduct phishing attacks or credential theft. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75939 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-15 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in openshift/oc-mirror. The tool incorrectly verifies PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) release image signatures by checking for signature errors before the entire signed body is processed, leading to a bypass of the signature verification. A remote attacker, by intercepting or manipulating network traffic to the signature endpoint, could exploit this to craft a PGP message with a valid Red Hat release key ID but a forged signature. This enables the `oc-mirror` tool to accept and mirror a malicious release payload into a disconnected registry, potentially compromising the integrity of software deployments. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49329 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-15 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in openshift/oauth-server. The OAuth login and error page endpoints pass the unauthenticated Accept-Language header to golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage() without input validation. A bypass of the CVE-2022-32149 mitigation exists: the upstream guard counts only '-' characters but the internal BCP 47 scanner aliases '_' to '-' after the guard check. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted Accept-Language header using '_' separators to trigger quadratic-time parsing, consuming excessive CPU and denying authentication to all cluster users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75887 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-15 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit a path traversal vulnerability by manipulating the `lng` and `ns` query parameters in the `/locales/resource.json` endpoint. This allows the attacker to read sensitive `*.json` files from the pod filesystem, including plugin manifests and configuration files. Furthermore, this flaw can enable path traversal against registered dynamic-plugin backends. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75885 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-15 | 9.3 Critical |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-108126 | 2026-10-15 | N/A | ||
| temporal-proxy 0.2.0 through 0.8.0 does not bind encrypted payloads to the namespace they were encrypted for. When payload encryption is enabled, the proxy chooses the decryption key by an identifier stored in the payload rather than by the namespace of the request, and nothing in the ciphertext records that namespace. A caller whom the proxy authorizes only for namespace B, and who has obtained an encrypted payload from namespace A, can therefore have the proxy decrypt it. In 0.8.0, the caller can submit the payload to the codec server's /decode endpoint. In every affected version, a caller who can also write to namespace B on the Temporal server directly can place the payload there and read it back through the proxy. This holds whether namespaces share the default key or each has its own, because a single proxy holds every key it is configured with. The issue does not give the attacker encrypted payloads they could not already obtain, and does not allow encrypted payloads to be modified. | ||||