Export limit exceeded: 11501 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11501 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-14922 | 1 Huggingface | 1 Diffusers | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Hugging Face Diffusers CogView4 Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Hugging Face Diffusers. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of checkpoints. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27424. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14931 | 1 Huggingface | 1 Smolagents | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Hugging Face smolagents Remote Python Executor Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Hugging Face smolagents. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of pickle data. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-28312. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15061 | 1 Framelink | 1 Figma Mcp Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Framelink Figma MCP Server fetchWithRetry Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Framelink Figma MCP Server. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the fetchWithRetry method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-27877. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42928 | 1 Sap | 1 Jconnect | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Under certain conditions, a high privileged user could exploit a deserialization vulnerability in SAP jConnect to launch remote code execution. The system may be vulnerable when specially crafted input is used to exploit the vulnerability resulting in high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10412 | 2 Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2 Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Product Options and Price Calculation Formulas for WooCommerce – Uni CPO (Premium) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to misconfigured file type validation in the 'uni_cpo_upload_file' function in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.55. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10771 | 1 Sick | 3 Inspector61x Firmware, Inspector62x Firmware, Tim3xx | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Due to missing input validation during one step of the firmware update process, the product is vulnerable to remote code execution. With network access and the user level ”Service”, an attacker can execute arbitrary system commands in the root user’s contexts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43649 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Authenticated command injection in the filename of a <redacted>.exe request leads to remote code execution as the root user. This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701. Likelihood: Moderate – This action is not a common place for command injection vulnerabilities to occur. Thus, an attacker will likely only be able to find this vulnerability by reverse-engineering the firmware or trying it on all <redacted> fields. The attacker will also need a (low privilege) account to gain access to the <redacted> binary, or convince a user with such access to execute a payload. Impact: Critical – The attacker has full control over the charging station as the root user, and can arbitrarily add, modify and delete files and services. CVSS clarification: This attack can be performed over any network conenction serving the web interfacr (AV:N), and there are not additional mitigating measures that need to be circumvented (AC:L) or other prerequisites (AT:N). The attack does require privileges, but the level does not matter (PR:L), there is no user interaction required (UI:N). The attack leeds to a full compromised of the charger (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) and a compromised charger can be used to "pivot" to networks that should normally not be reachable (SC:L/SI:L/SA:H). Because this is an EV chargers with significant pwoer, there is a potential safety imp0act (S:P). THis attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||
| CVE-2025-31700 | 1 Dahua | 2 Ipc, Sd | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in Dahua products. Attackers could exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability by sending specially crafted malicious packets, potentially causing service disruption (e.g., crashes) or remote code execution (RCE). Some devices may have deployed protection mechanisms such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), which reduces the likelihood of successful RCE exploitation. However, denial-of-service (DoS) attacks remain a concern. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31701 | 1 Dahua | 2 Ipc, Sd | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in Dahua products. Attackers could exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability by sending specially crafted malicious packets, potentially causing service disruption (e.g., crashes) or remote code execution (RCE). Some devices may have deployed protection mechanisms such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), which reduces the likelihood of successful RCE exploitation. However, denial-of-service (DoS) attacks remain a concern. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32062 | 1 Bosch | 1 Infotainment System Ecu | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The specific flaw exists within the Bluetooth stack developed by Alps Alpine of the Infotainment ECU manufactured by Bosch. The issue results from the lack of proper boundary validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a stack-based buffer overflow when receiving a specific packet on the established upper layer L2CAP channel. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to obtain remote code execution on the Infotainment ECU with root privileges. First identified on Nissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22962 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of GatesAir Maxiva UAXT, VAXT transmitters when debugging mode is enabled. An attacker with a valid session ID (sess_id) can send specially crafted POST requests to the /json endpoint, enabling arbitrary command execution on the underlying system. This vulnerability can lead to full system compromise, including unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and potentially full device takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23119 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An Improper Neutralization of Escape Sequences vulnerability could allow an Authentication Bypass with a Remote Code Execution (RCE) by a malicious actor with access to UniFi Protect Cameras adjacent network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52800 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| veraPDF is an open source PDF/A validation library. Executing policy checks using custom schematron files via the CLI invokes an XSL transformation that may theoretically lead to a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. This doesn't affect the standard validation and policy checks functionality, veraPDF's common use cases. Most veraPDF users don't insert any custom XSLT code into policy profiles, which are based on Schematron syntax rather than direct XSL transforms. For users who do, only load custom policy files from sources you trust. This issue has not yet been patched. Users are advised to be cautious of XSLT code until a patch is available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24480 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A Remote Code Execution Vulnerability exists in the product and version listed above. The vulnerability is due to lack of input sanitation and could allow a remote attacker to run commands or code as a high privileged user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24494 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| Path traversal may allow remote code execution using privileged account (requires device admin account, cannot be performed by a regular user). In combination with the 'Upload' functionality this could be used to execute an arbitrary script or possibly an uploaded binary. Remediation in Version 6.7.0, release date: 20-Oct-24. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25246 | 1 Netgear | 2 Xr1000, Xr500 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| NETGEAR XR1000 before 1.0.0.74, XR1000v2 before 1.1.0.22, and XR500 before 2.3.2.134 allow remote code execution by unauthenticated users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25286 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Crayfish is a collection of Islandora 8 microservices, one of which, Homarus, provides FFmpeg as a microservice. Prior to Crayfish version 4.1.0, remote code execution may be possible in web-accessible installations of Homarus in certain configurations. The issue has been patched in `islandora/crayfish:4.1.0`. Some workarounds are available. The exploit requires making a request against the Homarus's `/convert` endpoint; therefore, the ability to exploit is much reduced if the microservice is not directly accessible from the Internet, so: Prevent general access from the Internet from hitting Homarus. Alternatively or additionally, configure auth in Crayfish to be more strongly required, such that requests with `Authorization` headers that do not validate are rejected before the problematic CLI interpolation occurs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4389 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Crawlomatic Multipage Scraper Post Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the crawlomatic_generate_featured_image() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.8.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26264 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| GeoVision GV-ASWeb with the version 6.1.2.0 or less (fixed in 6.2.0), contains a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability within its Notification Settings feature. An authenticated attacker with "System Settings" privileges in ASWeb can exploit this flaw to execute arbitrary commands on the server, leading to a full system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27079 | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in the file creation process on the command line interface of AOS-8 Instant and AOS-10 AP could allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform remote code execution (RCE). Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying operating system leading to potential system compromise. | ||||