Export limit exceeded: 412386 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (412386 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-86977 | 1 Apple | 1 Ios And Ipados | 2026-10-20 | N/A |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved network restrictions. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27. An app may be able to initiate calls or send messages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84167 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Hotel Booking | 2026-10-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Hotel Booking WordPress plugin through 3.8 does not verify that a booking record belongs to the user requesting it, allowing any authenticated user such as a Subscriber to read other customers' booking details, including their name, email address, phone number and postal address, by referencing an identifier they do not own. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97804 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-10-20 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in HID class driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111918 | 2 Go-vikunja, Vikunja | 2 Vikunja, Vikunja | 2026-10-20 | 5.4 Medium |
| Vikunja from 1.0.0-rc0 before 2.7.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in RecalculateTaskPositions that allows authenticated users with zero accessible projects to write task_positions rows for all tasks instance-wide. Attackers can delete their Inbox after repointing default_project_id, then create empty-filter saved filters to persist cross-tenant references and amplify writes for denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84579 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-20 | N/A |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. Opening a file referencing a network share may lead to unexpected software execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84582 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 2 more | 2026-10-20 | N/A |
| A privacy issue was addressed with improved access restrictions. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, watchOS 27. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86868 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-20 | N/A |
| An authentication issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An attacker may be able to impersonate other users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86935 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-20 | N/A |
| This issue was addressed by removing additional entitlements. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86948 | 1 Apple | 1 Xcode | 2026-10-20 | N/A |
| This issue was addressed by enforcing library validation on the affected binaries. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86959 | 1 Apple | 2 Ios And Ipados, Macos | 2026-10-20 | N/A |
| An input validation issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. Processing a maliciously crafted image may lead to unexpected process termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111906 | 2 Phpmyfaq, Thorsten | 2 Phpmyfaq, Phpmyfaq | 2026-10-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| phpMyFAQ before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the Elasticsearch and OpenSearch administration API endpoints, which do not validate a CSRF token for the create, drop, and import actions. Attackers can lure a user with CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission to a malicious page that triggers these actions, deleting search indexes, forcing re-indexing, or exhausting resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111907 | 2 Phpmyfaq, Thorsten | 2 Phpmyfaq, Phpmyfaq | 2026-10-20 | 7.1 High |
| phpMyFAQ 4.0.0 before 4.1.9 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the POST /admin/api/update-database endpoint, which executes database migrations without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in user with the CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission into submitting a crafted cross-site request, triggering migrations that may impact database integrity or availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111908 | 2 Phpmyfaq, Thorsten | 2 Phpmyfaq, Phpmyfaq | 2026-10-20 | 8.3 High |
| phpMyFAQ 4.0.0 before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the PUT /api/v3.1/faq/update endpoint, which checks only the global edit_faq permission and does not verify access to the target FAQ. Authenticated users with edit_faq permission can supply the ID of a restricted FAQ they cannot view to modify its content, bypass moderation, and change its publication state. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111909 | 2 Phpmyfaq, Thorsten | 2 Phpmyfaq, Phpmyfaq | 2026-10-20 | 8.1 High |
| phpMyFAQ before 4.1.9 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the deleteUser() API that allows authenticated non-superadmin users with delete_user permission to delete superadmin accounts. Attackers can send a DELETE request to /admin/api/user/delete with a superadmin's userId other than 1, removing administrative access and accountability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111911 | 2 Phpmyfaq, Thorsten | 2 Phpmyfaq, Phpmyfaq | 2026-10-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| phpMyFAQ 4.0.0 before 4.1.9 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability where WebAuthn registration endpoints attach credentials to any account without authentication or challenge validation. Attackers can stage a victim username, submit a forged fmt=none attestation to register a passkey, then log in bypassing passwords and TOTP for account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-113384 | 1 Optimal Idm | 1 Optimalcloud | 2026-10-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in Optimal IdM OptimalCloud 5.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /v5.0/social. Executing a manipulation of the argument state can lead to open redirect. The attack can be executed remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-113349 | 1 Opencats | 1 Opencats | 2026-10-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| OpenCATS before 0.10.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in CalendarUI::onEditEvent() and onDeleteEvent() that allows authenticated users to modify or delete other users' calendar events. Attackers with EDIT or DELETE access can supply arbitrary eventID values to alter or remove any user's events, including non-public ones restricted to their owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112783 | 1 Opencats | 1 Opencats | 2026-10-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| OpenCATS before 0.10.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in ajax/deleteActivity.php and ajax/editActivity.php that allows READ-level users to edit and delete activity entries. Authenticated attackers can supply an arbitrary activityID via GET or POST to modify or delete activity and pipeline history for candidates, contacts and companies. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111283 | 2026-10-20 | 9 Critical | ||
| BMC Helix Network Management on-prem 26.3.00 before 26.3.01 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to log in as the local administrator with any password when SAML single sign-on is configured. Attackers can submit the administrator username with an arbitrary password on the web login page to obtain a SuperAdmin session, modify device credentials, run device commands, and alter audit records. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72045 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-20 | 8.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-af: cn10k: restrict VF LMTLINE sharing to its own PF rvu_mbox_handler_lmtst_tbl_setup() uses req->base_pcifunc as a direct index into the LMT map table to read another function's LMTLINE physical base address and copy it into the caller's own LMT map table entry. The mailbox dispatcher authenticates req->hdr.pcifunc from the IRQ source, but req->base_pcifunc is a separate payload field and is not sanitized. Reject the request with -EPERM when a VF caller's base_pcifunc is not a valid function under its own PF. is_pf_func_valid() bounds the FUNC field to the PF's configured VF count, keeping the computed index inside the caller's own slot block. | ||||