Export limit exceeded: 407579 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (407579 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73796 | 2026-10-14 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| A security vulnerability in HPE NonStop TSQLEXE may cause application crash via a crafted SQL query. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107913 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID is a duplicate of CVE-2026-39749 and was never published. Both IDs were assigned to the same Broken Access Control vulnerability in the App for Cloudflare WordPress plugin. All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-39749 instead of this ID. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108071 | 1 Tsplus | 1 Tsplus Remote Access | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| Incorrect authentication vulnerability in the TSplus Remote Access multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanism. A remote attacker authenticated with valid first-factor credentials could bypass the second-factor verification because the authentication flow does not correctly apply the MFA validation result, allowing the attacker to complete the login without a valid second-factor token and gain access to protected applications and resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108072 | 1 Tsplus | 1 Tsplus Remote Access | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| Vulnerability due to incorrect permissions in TSplus Remote Access shared login scripts. The autostart1.tscr files, located in the shared themes directory, allow users without sufficient privileges to write to them. A local attacker with a valid session on the terminal or remote desktop server could modify these files to execute arbitrary commands within another user’s security context when that user logs in using the same theme or operating mode. Depending on the affected user’s privileges, exploitation could allow lateral movement between users or privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105067 | 2026-10-14 | 8.5 High | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Webnus Modern Events Calendar Lite modern-events-calendar-lite allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Modern Events Calendar Lite: from n/a before 7.37.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103358 | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High | ||
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in VillaTheme Email Template Customizer for WooCommerce email-template-customizer-for-woo allows Code Injection.This issue affects Email Template Customizer for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.3.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107431 | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Crocoblock JetFormBuilder jetformbuilder allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects JetFormBuilder: from n/a through 3.6.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101341 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| Tokens of text in RDATA (of for example TXT records) under 32 bytes are not checked to stay within the space reserved for the RDATA allowing for arbitrary sized out of bound stack writes, including an overwrite of a callback function pointer which is called directly after parse. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101339 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| A HIP resource record that fills the RDATA near or at is limit, and has another dname RDATA field (a HIP Rendezvous server) can overwrite the stack with up to 191 bytes of attacker controlled data. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such as for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101338 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| When a SVCB or HTTPS RR has filled the wire format RDATA up to the brim, another ECH parameter may overwrite the stack, and once beyond the limit, the base64 decoder can write attacker controlled data of unlimited size. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such as for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101337 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | ||
| When base64 data is split up in pieces, of 3 character or less, tokens were incorrectly calculated to produce 0 bytes. This enables attackers to overwrite the stack with up to 64K of attacker controlled data. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such as for zones for which the NSD instance is secondary, will not be formatted like this. The zone file must be fed to NSD directly, (but it could come, for example, from an operator controlled provisioning system). | ||||
| CVE-2026-104795 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-10-14 | 8.8 High |
| The insights-runtime-extractor runs as a privileged DaemonSet (`hostPID: true`) that scans container processes for runtime fingerprinting. When scanning a container, the coordinator: 1. **fork()s** a child process 2. **setns()** into the target container's PID and mount namespaces 3. **fchdir()** back to an orphaned FD pointing at the extractor's own root filesystem (where `/crio.sock` is hostPath-mounted) 4. Calls **only `seteuid(target_uid)`** — changing the effective UID but leaving the **real UID and saved-set-UID at 0** and **retaining the permitted capability set** 5. The `check_no_privileged_perms()` guard inspects only the Effective capability set (so it passes), and is **skipped entirely when the target runs as uid 0** 6. The `VersionExecutable` fingerprint invokes `fpr_kind_executable` with `process.command_line[0]` — the target's argv[0], read from `/proc/<pid>/cmdline` and **fully controlled by the workload** 7. `fpr_kind_executable` calls `exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output()` — executing the **workload's own binary** inside the workload's mount namespace while **ruid=0 in the host user namespace** The executed process can call `setuid(0)` to restore full root with `CAP_SYS_ADMIN`, and inherits the orphaned cwd which resolves into the extractor container's filesystem containing the host CRI-O socket. ## Affected Code ### 1. Insufficient privilege drop (Rust — extractor coordinator) **File:** `extractor/src/insights_runtime_extractor.rs` ```rust // Lines 139-146 — seteuid-only drop, guard skipped for root containers join_process_namespaces(process.pid)?; change_dir(current_dir); switch_user(*process.uid)?; if *process.uid != 0 { perms::check_no_privileged_perms() .expect("Must not have privileged permissions to run fingerprints"); } fingerprint::run_fingerprints(&config, out_dir, &process); ``` ```rust // Lines 182-185 — only effective UID changed; ruid/suid stay 0 fn switch_user(uid: u32) -> Result<(), ScannerError> { debug!("... Becoming user: {uid}"); seteuid(uid.into()).map_err(|e| ScannerError::Errno(e)) } ``` ### 2. Execution of untrusted binary (Go — fingerprint) **File:** `fingerprints/pkg/utils/file.go` ```go // Lines 75-80 — executes a path taken verbatim from workload's argv[0] func GetExecutableVersionOutput(executable string) (string, error) { out, err := exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output() if err != nil { return "", err } return string(out), nil } ``` ### 3. Workload-controlled path forwarded (Rust — version_executable) **File:** `version_executable.rs` ```rust // Lines 29-34 — workload-controlled command_line[0] forwarded to fingerprint return Some(vec![ fpr_kind_executable, out_dir.to_string(), String::from(&process.command_line[0]), String::from(&version_executable.runtime_kind_name), ]); ``` ## Attack Pattern **Attacker:** Any tenant able to schedule a pod (unprivileged, any namespace) **Victim:** The node running the insights-runtime-extractor DaemonSet **Trigger:** Automatic — the DaemonSet scans all container processes on the node **Attack sequence:** 1. Attacker creates a pod whose process name matches a configured versioned-executable pattern (`node`, `python`, `python3`, `MainThread`, or contains `java`) 2. The pod's main binary (at the path matching argv[0]) is a malicious executable that calls `setuid(0)` to restore root 3. When the insights operator triggers a scan, the DaemonSet forks, enters the attacker's mount namespace, and executes the attacker's binary with ruid=0 4. The attacker's code regains full root with `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` in the host user namespace 5. The inherited cwd contains the host CRI-O socket → full node compromise | ||||
| CVE-2026-108070 | 1 Tsplus | 1 Tsplus Remote Access | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| A vulnerability involving improper access control in the TSplus Remote Access web server that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to access internal resources protected by manipulated paths through the /socket.io/JWN/ endpoint, bypassing the access restrictions intended for certain internal resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109730 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the Graphics component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 115.43, Firefox ESR 153.5, Thunderbird 158, and Thunderbird 153.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109711 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| Use-after-free in the Graphics: Canvas2D component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 153.5, Thunderbird 158, and Thunderbird 153.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103905 | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High | ||
| The authentication middleware of the JTL-Shop administration backend processes the plugin safe mode toggle on the admin logout route before checking whether the requesting user is authenticated. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore switch the shop's plugin safe mode on and off, which deactivates all installed plugins and their functionality, such as payment and shipping integrations, resulting in a shop-wide denial of service. The attack requires a single request and can be automated against many installations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70005 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2019 (server Core Installation), Windows Server 2022 and 2 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.9 Medium |
| Weak authentication in Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97315 | 2026-10-14 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The Responsive Blocks WordPress plugin before 2.3.0 does not sanitise or escape some of the values submitted with its Form block before adding them to the HTML notification email sent to the site owner, allowing unauthenticated users to inject arbitrary HTML, such as phishing links, into that email. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88998 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Tickera WordPress plugin before 3.6.0.4 does not correctly verify the integrity of incoming payment notifications, and the validated signature does not cover the order or the amount, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge a payment confirmation and mark arbitrary orders as paid without paying. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82844 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The WPForms Lite WordPress plugin before 2.0.2.2 does not verify server-side that a payment was completed before accepting a submission on forms using its PayPal Commerce gateway, allowing unauthenticated visitors to submit paid forms without paying. The form's confirmation is delivered and its notification emails are sent even though no order exists at the payment provider and no payment is recorded. | ||||