Search Results (8618 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2016-8312 1 Oracle 1 Flexcube Private Banking 2025-04-20 N/A
Vulnerability in the Oracle FLEXCUBE Private Banking component of Oracle Financial Services Applications (subcomponent: Product / Instrument Search). Supported versions that are affected are 2.0.1, 2.2.0 and 12.0.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle FLEXCUBE Private Banking. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle FLEXCUBE Private Banking, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle FLEXCUBE Private Banking accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle FLEXCUBE Private Banking accessible data. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts).
CVE-2016-8227 1 Lenovo 1 Transition 2025-04-20 N/A
Privilege escalation vulnerability in Lenovo Transition application used in Lenovo Yoga, Flex and Miix systems running Windows allows local users to execute code with elevated privileges.
CVE-2016-7801 1 Cybozu 1 Garoon 2025-04-20 N/A
Cybozu Garoon 3.0.0 to 4.2.2 allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions to delete other users' To-Dos via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2016-10369 1 Lxterminal Project 1 Lxterminal 2025-04-20 N/A
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).
CVE-2016-10148 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-04-20 N/A
The wp_ajax_update_plugin function in wp-admin/includes/ajax-actions.php in WordPress before 4.6 makes a get_plugin_data call before checking the update_plugins capability, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended read-access restrictions via the plugin parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php, a related issue to CVE-2016-6896.
CVE-2016-0768 1 Postgresql 1 Postgresql 2025-04-20 N/A
PostgreSQL PL/Java after 9.0 does not honor access controls on large objects.
CVE-2014-9961 1 Google 1 Android 2025-04-20 N/A
In all Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, a vulnerability in eMMC write protection exists that can be used to bypass power-on write protection.
CVE-2014-9830 1 Imagemagick 1 Imagemagick 2025-04-20 8.8 High
coders/sun.c in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a corrupted sun file.
CVE-2014-9831 1 Imagemagick 1 Imagemagick 2025-04-20 8.8 High
coders/wpg.c in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a corrupted wpg file.
CVE-2014-9827 1 Imagemagick 1 Imagemagick 2025-04-20 8.8 High
coders/xpm.c in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted xpm file.
CVE-2014-9828 1 Imagemagick 1 Imagemagick 2025-04-20 8.8 High
coders/psd.c in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted psd file.
CVE-2014-2277 1 Perltidy Project 1 Perltidy 2025-04-20 7.1 High
The make_temporary_filename function in perltidy 20120701-1 and earlier allows local users to obtain sensitive information or write to arbitrary files via a symlink attack, related to use of the tmpnam function.
CVE-2016-3729 1 Moodle 1 Moodle 2025-04-20 N/A
The user editing form in Moodle 3.0 through 3.0.3, 2.9 through 2.9.5, 2.8 through 2.8.11, 2.7 through 2.7.13, and earlier allows remote authenticated users to edit profile fields locked by the administrator.
CVE-2016-8444 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-04-20 N/A
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Qualcomm camera could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of the kernel. This issue is rated as High because it first requires compromising a privileged process. Product: Android. Versions: Kernel-3.10. Android ID: A-31243641. References: QC-CR#1074310.
CVE-2015-9245 1 Progress 1 Openedge 2025-04-20 N/A
Insecure default configuration in Progress Software OpenEdge 10.2x and 11.x allows unauthenticated remote attackers to specify arbitrary URLs from which to load and execute malicious Java classes via port 20931.
CVE-2013-7461 1 Mcafee 2 Application Control, Change Control 2025-04-20 N/A
A write protection and execution bypass vulnerability in McAfee (now Intel Security) Change Control (MCC) 6.1.0 for Linux and earlier allows authenticated users to change files that are part of write protection rules via specific conditions.
CVE-2013-7460 1 Mcafee 2 Application Control, Change Control 2025-04-20 N/A
A write protection and execution bypass vulnerability in McAfee (now Intel Security) Application Control (MAC) 6.1.0 for Linux and earlier allows authenticated users to change binaries that are part of the Application Control whitelist and allows execution of binaries via specific conditions.
CVE-2016-9378 1 Xen 1 Xen 2025-04-20 N/A
Xen 4.5.x through 4.7.x on AMD systems without the NRip feature, when emulating instructions that generate software interrupts, allows local HVM guest OS users to cause a denial of service (guest crash) by leveraging an incorrect choice for software interrupt delivery.
CVE-2016-7468 1 F5 10 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 7 more 2025-04-20 N/A
An unauthenticated remote attacker may be able to disrupt services on F5 BIG-IP 11.4.1 - 11.5.4 devices with maliciously crafted network traffic. This vulnerability affects virtual servers associated with TCP profiles when the BIG-IP system's tm.tcpprogressive db variable value is set to non-default setting "enabled". The default value for the tm.tcpprogressive db variable is "negotiate". An attacker may be able to disrupt traffic or cause the BIG-IP system to fail over to another device in the device group.
CVE-2016-9122 1 Go-jose Project 1 Go-jose 2025-04-20 N/A
go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated.