| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The file-serving function in TARGIT Decision Suite before 24.06.19002 (TARGIT Decision Suite 2024 – June) allows authenticated attackers to read or write to server files via a crafted file request. This can allow code execution via a .xview file. |
| The WP Crontrol plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to blind Server-Side Request Forgery in versions 1.17.0 to 1.19.1 via the 'wp_remote_request' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| OneNav v0.9.35-20240318 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /index.php?c=api&method=get_link_info. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) was discovered in the Akana API Platform in versions prior to and including 2022.1.3. Reported by Jakob Antonsson. |
| Akamai CloudTest before 60 2025.06.09 (12989) allows SSRF. |
| Applications that use Wget to access a remote resource using shorthand URLs and pass arbitrary user credentials in the URL are vulnerable. In these cases attackers can enter crafted credentials which will cause Wget to access an arbitrary host. |
| Octo-STS is a GitHub App that acts like a Security Token Service (STS) for the GitHub API. Octo-STS versions before v0.5.3 are vulnerable to unauthenticated SSRF by abusing fields in OpenID Connect tokens. Malicious tokens were shown to trigger internal network requests which could reflect error logs with sensitive information. Upgrade to v0.5.3 to resolve this issue. This version includes patch sets to sanitize input and redact logging. |
| A weakness has been identified in FNKvision Y215 CCTV Camera 10.194.120.40. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file s1_rf_test_config of the component Telnet Sevice. Executing manipulation can lead to backdoor. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. This attack is characterized by high complexity. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the embedded web server in various Lexmark devices. This vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to force the device to send an arbitrary HTTP request to a third-party server. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to internal network access / potential data disclosure from a device. |
| xtreme1 <= v0.9.1 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /api/data/upload path. The vulnerability is triggered through the fileUrl parameter, which allows an attacker to make arbitrary requests to internal or external systems. |
| A vulnerability was identified in wangsongyan wblog 0.0.1. This affects the function RestorePost of the file backup.go. Such manipulation of the argument fileName leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the SonicOS SSH management interface allows a remote attacker to establish a TCP connection to an IP address on any port when the user is logged in to the firewall. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an authenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Illia Cloud illia-Builder before v4.8.5 allows authenticated users to send arbitrary requests to internal services via the API. An attacker can leverage this to enumerate open ports based on response discrepancies and interact with internal services. |
| Vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki, Wikimedia Foundation Cite. This vulnerability is associated with program files includes/Parser/CoreParserFunctions.Php, includes/Parser/Sanitizer.Php.
This issue affects MediaWiki: from * before 1.39.14, 1.43.4, 1.44.1; Cite: from * before 1.39.14, 1.43.4, 1.44.1. |
| The Snow Monkey theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 29.1.5 via the request() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). |
| Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub and other standards. This vulnerability allows a user to maneuver the Webfinger mechanism to perform a GET request to any internal resource on any Host, Port, URL combination regardless of present security mechanisms, and forcing the victim’s server into an infinite loop causing Denial of Service. Moreover, this issue can also be maneuvered into performing a Blind SSRF attack. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.14, 1.1.11, 1.2.11, and 1.3.4. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in smarts-srl.com Smart Agent v.1.1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted script to the /FB/getFbVideoSource.php component. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks. |
