Export limit exceeded: 408271 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3735 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-1244 | 1 Apache | 1 Activemq | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in createDestination.action in Apache ActiveMQ before 5.3.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that create queues via the JMSDestination parameter in a queue action. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1184 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not have the expected countermeasures against replay attacks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, related to lack of checking of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count or client nonce count) values. | ||||
| CVE-2011-5062 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check qop values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended integrity-protection requirements via a qop=auth value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | ||||
| CVE-2011-5063 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check realm values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the availability of a protection space with weaker authentication or authorization requirements, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | ||||
| CVE-2010-1870 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The OGNL extensive expression evaluation capability in XWork in Struts 2.0.0 through 2.1.8.1, as used in Atlassian Fisheye, Crucible, and possibly other products, uses a permissive whitelist, which allows remote attackers to modify server-side context objects and bypass the "#" protection mechanism in ParameterInterceptors via the (1) #context, (2) #_memberAccess, (3) #root, (4) #this, (5) #_typeResolver, (6) #_classResolver, (7) #_traceEvaluations, (8) #_lastEvaluation, (9) #_keepLastEvaluation, and possibly other OGNL context variables, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-6504. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1772 | 2 Apache, Opensymphony | 3 Struts, Webwork, Xwork | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in XWork in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.2.3, and OpenSymphony XWork in OpenSymphony WebWork, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) an action name, (2) the action attribute of an s:submit element, or (3) the method attribute of an s:submit element. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4858 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 10 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 7 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.35, and 7.x before 7.0.23 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0394 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The DebuggingInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1, when developer mode is used, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors. NOTE: the vendor characterizes this behavior as not "a security vulnerability itself. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4386 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The token check mechanism in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 does not properly validate the token name configuration parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by setting the token name configuration parameter to a session attribute. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1965 | 1 Apache | 2 Struts, Struts2-showcase | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Struts Showcase App 2.0.0 through 2.3.13, as used in Struts 2 before 2.3.14.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted parameter name that is not properly handled when invoking a redirect. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2115 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-11 | 8.1 High |
| Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.14.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OGNL code via a crafted request that is not properly handled when using the includeParams attribute in the (1) URL or (2) A tag. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-1966. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4316 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 4 Struts, Flexcube Private Banking, Mysql Enterprise Monitor and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15.1 enables Dynamic Method Invocation by default, which has unknown impact and attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2011-3620 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Qpid, Enterprise Mrg | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Qpid 0.12 does not properly verify credentials during the joining of a cluster, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to the messaging functionality and job functionality of a cluster by leveraging knowledge of a cluster-username. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4310 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15.1 allows remote attackers to bypass access controls via a crafted action: prefix. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1475 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP BIO connector in Apache Tomcat 7.0.x before 7.0.12 does not properly handle HTTP pipelining, which allows remote attackers to read responses intended for other clients in opportunistic circumstances by examining the application data in HTTP packets, related to "a mix-up of responses for requests from different users." | ||||
| CVE-2012-2149 | 3 Apache, Libwpd, Redhat | 5 Openoffice.org, Libwpd, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The WPXContentListener::_closeTableRow function in WPXContentListener.cpp in libwpd 0.8.8, as used by OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.4, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Wordperfect .WPD document that causes a negative array index to be used. NOTE: some sources report this issue as an integer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1149 | 5 Apache, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 10 Openoffice.org, Debian Linux, Fedora and 7 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the vclmi.dll module in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 3.3, 3.4 Beta, and possibly earlier, and LibreOffice before 3.5.3, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted embedded image object, as demonstrated by a JPEG image in a .DOC file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2010-4539 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The walk function in repos.c in the mod_dav_svn module for the Apache HTTP Server, as distributed in Apache Subversion before 1.6.15, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via vectors that trigger the walking of SVNParentPath collections. | ||||
| CVE-2010-4312 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The default configuration of Apache Tomcat 6.x does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack a session via script access to a cookie. | ||||
| CVE-2010-4253 | 4 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 4 Openoffice, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Impress in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PNG file in an ODF or Microsoft Office document, as demonstrated by a PowerPoint (aka PPT) document. | ||||