Export limit exceeded: 409947 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4544 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0831 | 2 Wordpress, Wpdevteam | 2 Wordpress, Templately | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Templately plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.8. This is due to inadequate input validation in the `save_template_to_file()` function where user-controlled parameters like `session_id`, `content_id`, and `ai_page_ids` are used to construct file paths without proper sanitization. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to write arbitrary `.ai.json` files to locations within the uploads directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2386 | 2 Posimyththemes, Wordpress | 2 The Plus Addons For Elementor – Addons For Elementor, Page Templates, Widgets, Mega Menu, Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The The Plus Addons for Elementor – Addons for Elementor, Page Templates, Widgets, Mega Menu, WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Incorrect Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 6.4.7. This is due to the tpae_create_page() AJAX handler authorizing users only with current_user_can('edit_posts') while accepting a user-controlled 'post_type' value passed directly to wp_insert_post() without post-type-specific capability checks. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to create arbitrary draft posts for restricted post types (e.g., 'page' and 'nxt_builder') via the 'post_type' parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34512 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.25 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the HTTP /sessions/:sessionKey/kill route that allows any bearer-authenticated user to invoke admin-level session termination functions without proper scope validation. Attackers can exploit this by sending authenticated requests to kill arbitrary subagent sessions via the killSubagentRunAdmin function, bypassing ownership and operator scope restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1999 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| An incorrect authorization vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker to merge their own pull request into a repository without having push access by exploiting an authorization bypass in the enable_auto_merge mutation for pull requests. This issue only affected repositories that allow forking as the attack relies on opening a pull request from an attacker-controlled fork into the target repository. Exploitation was only possible in specific scenarios. It required a clean pull request status and only applied to branches without branch protection rules enabled. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server versions prior to 3.19.2, 3.18.5, and 3.17.11, and was fixed in versions 3.19.2, 3.18.5, and 3.17.11. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24029 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Dnsdist | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| When the early_acl_drop (earlyACLDrop in Lua) option is disabled (default is enabled) on a DNS over HTTPs frontend using the nghttp2 provider, the ACL check is skipped, allowing all clients to send DoH queries regardless of the configured ACL. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35490 | 2 Dgtlmoon, Webtechnologies | 2 Changedetection.io, Changedetection | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| changedetection.io is a free open source web page change detection tool. Prior to 0.54.8, the @login_optionally_required decorator is placed before (outer to) @blueprint.route() instead of after it. In Flask, @route() must be the outermost decorator because it registers the function it receives. When the order is reversed, @route() registers the original undecorated function, and the auth wrapper is never in the call chain. This silently disables authentication on these routes. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.54.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4639 | 2 Galaxy Software Services Corporation, Gss | 2 Vitals Esp, Vitalsesp | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Vitals ESP developed by Galaxy Software Services has a Incorrect Authorization vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to perform certain administrative functions, thereby escalating privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2619 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.6 before 18.8.9, 18.9 before 18.9.5, and 18.10 before 18.10.3 that under certain circumstances could have allowed an authenticated user with auditor privileges to modify vulnerability flag data in private projects due to incorrect authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1752 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 11.3 before 18.8.9, 18.9 before 18.9.5, and 18.10 before 18.10.3 that could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to modify protected environment settings due to improper authorization checks in the API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39381 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to 9.8.0-alpha.7 and 8.6.75, the GET /sessions/me endpoint returns _Session fields that the server operator explicitly configured as protected via the protectedFields server option. Any authenticated user can retrieve their own session's protected fields with a single request. The equivalent GET /sessions and GET /sessions/:objectId endpoints correctly strip protected fields. This vulnerability is fixed in 9.8.0-alpha.7 and 8.6.75. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11802 | 1 Apache | 1 Solr | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Apache Solr, the cluster can be partitioned into multiple collections and only a subset of nodes actually host any given collection. However, if a node receives a request for a collection it does not host, it proxies the request to a relevant node and serves the request. Solr bypasses all authorization settings for such requests. This affects all Solr versions prior to 7.7 that use the default authorization mechanism of Solr (RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin). | ||||
| CVE-2025-23244 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Gpu Display Driver | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability which could allow an unprivileged attacker to escalate permissions. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62506 | 1 Minio | 1 Minio | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11176 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper access control vulnerability in M-Files Aino in versions before 24.10 allowed an authenticated user to access object information via incorrect evaluation of effective permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48784 | 1 Sampmax | 1 Sampmax Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An Incorrect Access Control issue in SAMPMAX com.sampmax.homemax 2.1.2.7 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the firmware update process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48778 | 1 Giant Manufacturing | 1 Ridelink Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue in GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., LTD RideLink (tw.giant.ridelink) 2.0.7 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the firmware update process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48787 | 1 Revic Optics | 1 Revic Ops Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue in Revic Optics Revic Ops (us.revic.revicops) 1.12.5 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the firmware update process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50671 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Incorrect access control in Adapt Learning Adapt Authoring Tool <= 0.11.3 allows attackers with Authenticated User roles to obtain email addresses via the "Get users" feature. The vulnerability occurs due to a flaw in permission verification logic, where the wildcard character in permitted URLs grants unintended access to endpoints restricted to users with Super Admin roles. This makes it possible for attackers to disclose the email addresses of all users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41031 | 1 T-innova | 1 Deporsite | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Lack of authorisation in Deporsite by T-INNOVA. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to change other users' profile pictures via a POST request using the parameters ‘IdPersona’ and “Foto” in ‘/ajax/TInnova_c/FotoUsuario/llamadaAjax/uploadImage’. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24869 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java allows an attacker to access an endpoint that can disclose information about deployed server components, including their XML definitions. This information should ideally be restricted to customer administrators, even though they may not need it. These XML files are not entirely SAP-internal as they are deployed with the server. In such a scenario, sensitive information could be exposed without compromising its integrity or availability. | ||||